AWS vs. BlueHost Best Choice For Web Hosting

AWS and BlueHost, both are providers of web hosting. Starting with the comparison of AWS vs. BlueHost, BlueHost is well-known and prominent for its cost-effective shared hosting. However, AWS is a pioneer name in the cloud hosting industry. It is ideal for regular websites and appropriate for high-traffic, massive platforms that also develop apps.

This comparison of AWS vs. BlueHost is like comparing the two best things. They both are good providers and legendary pickup. Yet, the comparison is possible as each web hosting provider offers different web services, keeping varying purposes and diverse goals in mind. Therefore, users can choose the most cost-effective and safest hosting service between both.

AWS vs. BlueHost- Overview

AWS represents Amazon Web Services as the company providing internet services. It has a lot of dominant areas. This platform with IAAS (Infrastructure-As-A-Service) is the largest and is highly friendly towards integrations with third-party. AWS holds more market share due to its innovative process of setup and its exceptional management.

AWS does not disappoint its users. It offers plenty of services and tools, including Management Tools, Developers Tools, Mobile, Enterprise Apps, Security, IoT, and more. AWS provides many types of services in this hosting industry than any other company. Though it is not necessary to announce, yet it is a must to say AWS offers some impressive hosting services.

Looking at AWS vs. BlueHost as the comparison point, the AWS suite is a component optimized for medium-sized businesses. It has one server running the CMS, such as Joomla and WordPress.

BlueHost was established in 2003 by Matt Heaton. BlueHost, in this industry of web hosting, is known as one of the giant players. There are more than 2 million websites on its servers, while it is known for its reliability of high level and user-friendliness. It is also a recognizable name in web hosting.

BlueHost was bought in 2010 by Endurance International Group, a tech giant. However, many critics believe that it has pushed the quality down, and the growth has consequently seen a dip. BlueHost is proving the critics wrong, as the hosting provider is working to improve the service quality. Its growth reveals its efficiency that it is now officially recommended by WordPress. To learn about the fascinating history of the company BlueHost, it is a must to go through this review in-depth. It will help in deciding your choice, AWS vs., BlueHost.

AWS vs. BlueHost – Performance

Analyzing the performance of both AWS and BlueHost is essential among both contenders. Exactly, gauging the performance of AWS is possible if you purchase a hosting plan and build a WordPress website as a basic step.  However, users are happy with AWS uptime and the speed as both are amazing and do not hinder work for longer periods. Moreover, AWS concentrates more on the app development needs and offers pretty unique features. 

BlueHost offers a cPanel to manage the site, and there is no need to hire new web developers or ask for live chat support for assistance. It also has the SSL certificate on spending every month some extra dollars. BlueHost is prominent for its reliable and cheap hosting and completes in one-click WordPress installation and cPanel. BlueHost is ideal for web hosting but is more expensive and is not simple to use. 

AWS vs. BlueHost- Speed

AWS offers an average response time, and on testing the speed of page load, it measures around 380ms. It is time you go outside North America and Europe or nearby locations. The response speed within North America and Europe is low consistently than 100ms. The response time of the AWS is significantly slow, reaching values lower than 3800ms. It is not a good show. However, the performance uptime of AWS is fair. It offers its performers an above-average rating, and users should have no issues relating to the speed. 

A similar speed test was performed with BlueHost, and they came up with 215ms as an average response. The speed at times is average or a bit faster, and it may be due to the variation in the testing period. Like most hosts, BlueHost also had a speed above average. Though it cannot be considered exceptional, it was above average and decent. The traffic speed during a spike was maintained as stable, while the former, AWS, was lacking.

AWS vs BlueHost- Uptime

The uptime is a crucial factor of comparison for AWS vs. BlueHost. It also calls for the place and the downtime duration to take into account to consider the uptime. Therefore, performance is critical, and here are the details.

AWS recorded 99.98% as an impressive uptime during the testing period. It was amazing to come so close to 100% and to claim to be perfect. The server agreement of AWS offers an uptime guarantee, and it takes care to maintain it.  Any time the uptime goes lesser than 99.9% or is equal to or greater to 99.0%, there is a service credit of 10%. If the uptime goes lesser to 99.0%, while it is greater than 95.0%, there is a service credit of 25%. You get a 100% service credit if the uptime goes less than 95%, and this is mostly impossible. AWS offers are good with an uptime guarantee.

BlueHost in the tests showed an uptime of 99.99%. It is close to 100% and is stated as guaranteed uptime. Thus, BlueHost has the top marks, but this does not stay steady; it can change. The downtime is taken into account during the test. If it is higher, the uptime percentage will decrease.

Fortunately, BlueHost is pretty great, yet there is no uptime guarantee, as such, but the downtime is also rare, and the 99, 99% is maintained. BlueHost is the same with its server speed and with its uptime consistent when checked on more occasions. The result was the same, showing they do not change.

AWS vs. BlueHost -Security Comparison 

Security is an important measure to consider while making a comparison of hosting sites. Although AWS vs. BlueHost is exceptionally good in offering security, it is a must to know its effectiveness, and it helps decide a web hosting provider.

AWS offers great security services. The security groups create rules to control the outgoing and incoming traffic on the firewall. The IAM (Identity and Access Management) helps create groups, frame rules, and user permissions to allow or deny access to AWS resources. AWS account permits unique credentials within the account so that there is individual access to the required AWS services and resources. 

There is a security feature offering total control over the outbound and inbound network traffic. The Virtual Private Clouds secure applications when necessary and restrict access from and to the internet. AWS connects directly and establishes a virtual interface privately between Amazon Virtual private cloud and an on-premise network, a secure and private network connection. These features are high-end and are not something that you can find with most traditional hosting providers. 

BlueHost has valuable measures to ensure security. It encompasses free SSL certificates from Codeguard and Let’s Encrypt. The Codeguard is a tool that automatically helps in backup accounts. In addition, Bluehost offers a domain privacy tool to keep sensitive information away from the public and prevents hackers from getting details to enable phishing activities. It also provides Postini from Google as spam protection for your emails.

BlueHost supports the encryption PGP/GPG so that the file transfers are secure. In addition, Bluehost offers a third-party product, Sitelock, to serve as a malware scanner and work as a firewall. So there is a check to keep your site protected, and BlueHost ensures keeping your things secure.

AWS vs. BlueHost -Plans & Pricing

Plans and pricing is also a notable point to consider before deciding on any host. Some things cannot be ignored, such as the affordable factor. Is the price worthy for the services received should be understood? Though both AWS vs. BlueHost are offering their best plans and pricing.

AWS provides pricing in 7 levels, and they fall under Windows or Linux servers. It is recommended to opt for Linux servers, and using Windows servers should be done only for a particular reason. It is the reason not many companies choose or prefer servers that are Window-based. AWS offers 7 levels of packages, but they do not bear any fancy names.

  • Level 1: 1 core processor, 1 TB transfer 20GB SD card, and 512MB memory, ($3.50 per month)
  • Level 2: Memory of 1 GB, Transfer 2 TB, 1 core processor, and 40 GB SD disk ($5 per month)
  • Level 3: 60GB SD disk, Memory of 2 GB, 3 TB transfer, and 1 core processor,  ($10 per month)
  • level 4: 2 core processors, Memory of 4 GB, 80 GB SD disk, and Transfer of 4 TB ($20 per month)
  • Level 5: 160 GB SSD transfer,  2 core processors, Memory 8 GB, and transfers of 5 TB ($40 per month)
  • Level 6: SSD disk space 320GB, 16 GB memory, Transfers 6TB, and 4 core processors, ($80 per month)
  • Level 7: Memory of 32 GB, Transfers 7 TB, 640 GB SSD card, and 8 core processors, ($160 per month).

AWS does not give any free domain name that many other web hosts give. With AWS, it is a process to get a domain register separately from their domain registrar, such as Namecheap, etc. Therefore, AWS is not popular or has not gained any recognition by offering freebies, and the users are also not allowed to get free site migrations.AWS is suitable for giant corporations as it is pricey and nothing comes for free, but the businesses aiming for cheap hosting may not fit the bill.

BlueHost gives four Shared hosting plans. It is already special as most give only three plans and BlueHost offers one extra. Therefore, it leaves room for scalability. The plans are as per the names such as Basic plan, Plus plan, Choice-plus plan, and Pro plan. 

  • Basic plan features free SSL certificate, 1 website, 5 parked domains, 1 free domain, storage 50GB, 25 subdomains, and unmetered bandwidth. It costs per month $2.95 inclusive of discount and $7.99 as renewal costs.
  • Plus plan features marketing offer $200, unlimited domains, unlimited parked domains, unlimited websites, unlimited subdomains, unlimited storage, and spam experts. The plan costs per month $5.45 inclusive of a discount and $10.99 as renewal or standard cost.
  • Choice-Plus plan features domain protection and privacy, 365 mailbox 1-office for 30 days for free, and Codeguard as site backup. This plan costs $5.45 inclusive of a discount, the same as the former plan, and $14.99 as renewal or normal cost.
  • Pro Plan is expensive, the per month cost is $13.95 inclusive of discount, and it will cost per month $23.99 as renewal or standard cost. It offers Choice-Plus plan features in association with high performance and a dedicated IP address. BlueHost claims that Pro servers allow 300,000 file count and fewer users are deployed per server that the performance is robust. Thus, each user gets to use more resources in comparison to the lower hosting normal plans. The pricing of the BlueHost is appropriate for small businesses, and it offers more free options in a lot than AWS.

AWS vs. BlueHost -Extra Features

AWS offers these features as Extras such as:

  • The server choice option gives the users to choose between a Windows and a Linux server.
  • AWS supports many platforms such as WordPress, Ruby, Joomla, and Magento.
  • There is virtual cloud storage and scheduled backups.
  • Choose a server location as a data center.
  • Customer supports 24/7, decent customer support with email, live chat, and ticketing system. Though the complaints about the support quality of AWS do arise at times, the experience is fair.

BlueHost offers these features as Extras such as:

  • BlueHost supports the Perl modules, PHP Pear packages, Cron jobs, and Apache handlers.
  • One-click installation from MOJO ensures more than 100+ apps.
  • Blue Flash is a customer care special feature allowing you to access dedicated help from experts to get your website in WordPress up and running.
  • BlueHost offers Weebly web building services to users and CDN access.
  • Virtual cloud storage and scheduled backups
  • Has both PostgreSQL and MYSQL databases, and you may use RemoteMySQL or PHPMyAdmin to handle your databases.
  • Marketing offers of $200.

Going through the comparison of AWS vs. BlueHost here is sure to convince you to choose without a double-mind. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *